Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAIRS Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No objections raised. This really didn't need to be relisted. Aervanath (talk) 16:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PAIRS Foundation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable training program. Looks to be promotional article. Fails WP:NORG. Graywalls (talk) 19:20, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And undisclosed paid editing appears to be involved. Graywalls (talk) 01:28, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 19:20, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 19:20, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:00, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:17, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cabayi (talk) 10:58, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I suppose I should have PROD'ed first. Could it be soft-deleted since there's ben no input? Graywalls (talk) 19:46, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 05:57, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - lack of independent sources available Spiderone 11:03, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.